Unprecedented Violence
In the beginning, the people of America were “said to have derived an hereditary impression of danger to liberty, from standing armies in time of peace.”[1] It was also true that the people of America were “aware that inducements to war” were most often sold to the public with “pretenses to color and justify them.”[2] If we ever possessed such discernment in the past, it would seem that we’ve lost that ability by now.
One of the fiercest debates surrounding the ratification of our Constitution was standing armies being kept during times of peace. As such there were calls to include a provision to prevent standing armies in times of peace. The Framers rejected such a provision because they knew that there would always be at least one nation somewhere in the world that “maintains constantly a disciplined army, ready for the service of ambition or revenge,” as such, this kind of behavior “obliges the most pacific nations who may be within the reach of its enterprises to take corresponding precautions.”[3]
The Framers also understood that “It is of the nature of war to increase the executive at the expense of the legislative authority.”[4] As was their genius, they built checks into our Constitution to curb the threat of standing armies and ambitious men in the White House to keep them from becoming kings in this regard.
Madison explained that “the best possible precaution against danger from standing armies is a limitation of the term for which revenue may be appropriated to their support.”[5] Unfortunately, this two-year check against controlling standing armies has been completely neutered because there is no debate in Congress anymore over appropriations to keep standing armies afoot. The Military Industrial Complex that Eisenhower warned us about has completely taken over the Congress and facilitated leaks of our technology so as to make sure there was always a threat to keep standing armies around.
The other check that the Framers put into our Constitution in this regard was to give the exclusive power to declare war in the hands of the Congress. Originally, the President could not go to war without an official Congressional Declaration of War. We have completely destroyed both of the checks built into the U.S. Constitution to prevent ambitious men in the White House to use formidable standing armies to threaten our peace, safety, and liberty. To anyone watching, we are now in the exact same situation that Jefferson described in the Declaration of Independence.
Thomas Jefferson called out King George’s “usurpations” as nothing but “tyranny.” These acts of usurpation, he explained, included King George’s “transporting large Armies” at will “to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny.”[6] Today’s U.S. President now transports his armies at will and on his own cognizance for the purposes of attacking another nation without a Declaration of War from Congress. This kind of executive power will only bring tyranny because it makes the president a king.
In fact, every President knows that there is nothing like a good, quick, violent war to demonstrate our superiority in order to get the fans all riled up and to forget about everything else. These foreign actors make for great show trials, and they keep the masses distracted from the real criminals here in the U.S.
Nowhere in our Constitution does it authorize a U.S. President to declare and engage in war. As such, he and his attorneys at the DOJ often refer to these unconstitutional wars as something else other than a war. They use terms like “military operations,” “special ops,” or even an execution of “an arrest with military support.”
Yet, undeniably, the Framers gave us the uncensored definition of war in The Federalist Papers. War, they explained, will “arise either from violation of treaties or from direct violence.”[7] Bombing another country, whether or not it is called something else by the DOJ, is still, without question, “direct violence” and, therefore, according to the Framers, an act of war.
Most of us have heard by now all of the “pretenses to color and justify” the President’s “direct violence” against Venezuela without a Congressional Declaration of War – the oil, gold, the voting machines, the drugs, Chinese influence, criminal indictments, and its popularity by the Venezuelan people. Whether or not any of these justifications are true is completely irrelevant.
The Framers wanted to protect the American people, not the Venezuelan people, from tyranny, so they placed the power to authorize war into the hands of Congress and NOT the president. The Framers had been living under a monarchy. They understood that, if they gave unchecked power to the President to make war, he would be a king despite all of the “pretenses to color and justify” it as something else by the attorneys.
The Framers explained that being the Commander-in-Chief of the army and navy does not give the President the power to declare war. Under our Constitution, they explained, the power to make war differs from “the British king” whose power “extends to the DECLARING of war and to the RAISING and REGULATING of fleets and armies, all which, by the Constitution under consideration, would appertain to the legislature.”[8]
If all of the justifications to commit “direct violence” against Venezuela that President Trump’s attorneys are now, after the fact, presenting to the public are valid, then, the U.S. Constitution requires that the President must first go to Congress and convince them to let him wage war against Venezuela. If Congress becomes convinced by the President’s arguments, then they will make a Congressional Declaration of War. This is the ONLY constitutionally authorized way for a President to wage war against another country.
Many believe that this is too difficult and arduous of a process even though it was designed that way. As such, our Presidents, under the cover of the DOJ, resort to bypassing the Congress with their clever euphemisms. They also use diversions to distract the public such as arresting a “rogue” foreign dictator and bringing him to the U.S. for the DOJ to prosecute him instead of prosecuting criminals here at home.
As such, anyone who truly understands and believes in our U.S. Constitution knows that the Executive has been turned into a monarchy, since Presidents are committing acts of war against sovereign nations without any valid constitutional Congressional Declarations of War just as King George was doing at the writing of the Declaration of Independence.
In doing so, attorneys at the DOJ argue that prior historical acts of other presidents validate their unconstitutional wars. Two wrongs have never made a right. Madison clearly understood this and warned us from the start that “there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power, than by violent and sudden usurpations.”[9] The examples given by the DOJ of prior presidents unilaterally committing acts of war without a Congressional Declaration of War are nothing more than the “gradual and silent encroachments of those in power” that Madison warned about. This is how tyranny forms.
Instead of prosecuting the criminals here at home, our dear leaders just continue to kill or kidnap our enemies in their foreign lands. Our leaders blatantly refuse to follow our U.S. Constitution’s “few and defined” limited powers. They continue to promote and prop up an unsound, unconstitutional paper dollar with heretofore unimaginable spending in order to maintain their war machine.
“Direct violence,” now more than ever, appears to be the weapon of choice for creating a so-called “everlasting peace.” Just this year alone, the “peace candidate” has already engaged in a 12-day war with Iran, bombed Nigeria and other targets in and around the Golis Mountains of Somalia. He has blown up over 30 drug boats in the Caribbean and now has invaded and engaged in war against Venezuela. Yet not a single arrest and prosecution of any Deep State actors has taken place by the DOJ.
Zelensky has even claimed that our “peace candidate” is considering deployment of U.S. troops to Ukraine. Somehow, it is considered to be justice when we invade another country in our hemisphere and kidnap or arrest its president, but it is an unforgivable crime when Russia does it in its own hemisphere. Our actions in Iran, Ukraine and elsewhere violates the Monroe Doctrine, because it says that we will stay out of their hemisphere, and they have to stay out of ours. We have been meddling in their hemisphere for a very long time in violation of the Monroe Doctrine.
If that wasn’t enough, our current “peace candidate” continues to issue more and more threats of hellish bombing on Hamas, Iran, Venezuela, Columbia, and anyone else who doesn’t follow his supreme commands to accept his vision of “everlasting peace.” At the same time, our leaders continue to criticize others for engaging in similar acts of violence even when those same acts of violence are used to secure their own hemispheric borders. These continued acts of violence provide cover for the DOJ’s inaction against the criminals here at home. Isaiah was spot on when he said that the Lord will send a modern “Assyrian” against a “hypocritical nation” to destroy them.[10]
Can anyone seriously believe that direct violence against others will create an “everlasting peace”? Remember the Great War? It was touted as the “war to end all wars,” but it’s now known as World War I because there was a second World War, and now the third one is just around the corner.
Similarly, peace slogans were used by Woodrow Wilson, another “peace candidate,” and others like British author H.G. Wells to promote their violence. They actually argued that the unprecedented destructiveness of their Great War would somehow lead to the abandonment of war. Interestingly enough, much like our current “peace candidate”, who campaigned for his second term on the slogan that he kept us out “endless wars” during his first term in 2016, Wilson campaigned for his second term of office in 1916 using the slogan “He kept us out of war.”
Wilson also argued that his unprecedented violence would, in the end, promote “democracy,” create a “lasting peace” through international cooperation, and result in “better laws.” Like every other politician in D.C., he clearly felt that the U.S. Constitution was outdated. Yet, the U.S. Constitution is still the ONLY political beacon that we can follow to save ourselves from a violent destruction. Unfortunately, politicians along with their supporters only ever talk about our Constitution when they can use it as a battering ram against the other side.
Clearly, the Framers’ confidence in the intelligence of the American citizen was wrong because they continue to believe in today’s warmongers, who still make the claim that their acts of violence will bring peace. On the contrary, it was the unprecedented violence in World War I that resulted in the killing of more than 22 million people. Their unprecedented violence most certainly did not bring peace. It only brought more unprecedented weapons of violence to be used in future wars. Weapons that can now destroy ALL of humanity.
Finally, politicians also view violence as a legitimate means of not only killing people in foreign countries, but they love to use it as a way to remove their own political opponents here at home. Rampant domestic violence, which includes political assassinations, is just another reason why Christians should be able to see that we have arrived at the End Times.
“The earth [was] filled with violence” so God flooded the earth.[11] Jerusalem loved violence because they made “haste to shed innocent blood,”[12] so it was destroyed. When foreign dictators defy us, we get angry and rush to commit “direct violence” against them instead of minding our own borders.
Violence is a staple in our culture. It is the real reason we will be destroyed like civilizations of the past. Politicians who talk of peace while committing direct acts of violence will always lead us to the same end. The scriptures clearly warn us that, “when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them.”[13] “Everlasting peace” will not be brought about by unconstitutional acts of “direct violence.”
No matter how much we wish it, this time will not be any different. As such, I am making another prediction just as in the past where anyone familiar with my writings knows that I have made a number of predictions with time sensitive accuracy.[14] I predicted to the day when Biden would be ousted before anyone else was talking about it.
In 2007, I predicted that SCOTUS would legalize same sex marriages within ten years. The Obergefell case was decided in 2015. In 2018, I predicted the timing and initial location of a biological attack on the United States by the Chinese, which happened at the end of 2019.
In 2023, in response to Charlie’s “call for conservatives to use the same unlawful tactics against the political opposition,” I predicted would “most assuredly escalate into actual violence.”[15] Violence has most certainly escalated since that prediction but even more so since Charlie’s horrific, violent, and very public assassination.
Even now, President Trump is taking on Europe over Ukraine and Greenland. He is taking on Blackrock with his threatened ban to prevent Big Corporations from buying single dwelling homes. He is taking on the Military Industrial Complex with threats to cancel contracts for lack of performance, excessive pay, and other things. He is threatening the Deep State with prosecutions.
He is threatening and attacking countries like Iran and Venezuela. The Venezuelan War, in particular, also harms the Chinese by cutting off their oil supply among other things. President Trump told Fox News that he is prepared to launch military strikes in Mexico against the Mexican drug cartels. The Democrats are losing control of the narrative along with their voting base with all of President Trump’s aggressive deportations. Hillary still harbors a great deal of animosity towards President Trump for stealing her place in history, and we’ve all heard the rumors about “the body count.”
As such, I am making another prediction that one or all of these groups will attempt to assassinate President Trump by the end of February 2026. If they are successful, it will accelerate our descent into unprecedented violence, anarchy, chaos, and the complete destruction of our Union.
We need to eschew violence. The talking heads and the DOJ are only enabling the violence. We need to convince our President to stop using “direct violence” to impose peace and to follow the Monroe Doctrine which clearly states that we will stay out of the wars outside of our hemisphere. The President needs the DOJ to help him be more faithful to the rules laid down by God through the Framers with our U.S. Constitution. We need to restore our Constitutional Republic, if we are to save the Union, save ourselves, and save our posterity.
Madame Publius
[1] Hamilton, The Federalist Papers, Ltr. 26, ¶5
[2] Jay, The Federalist Papers, Ltr. 4, ¶10
[3] Madison, The Federalist Papers, Ltr. 41, ¶8
[4] Hamilton, The Federalist Papers, Ltr. 8, ¶5
[5] Madison, The Federalist Papers, Ltr. 41, ¶13
[6] Jefferson, The Declaration of Independence
[7] Jay, The Federalist Papers, Ltr. 3, ¶¶5-6
[8] Hamilton, The Federalist Papers, Ltr. 69, ¶8
[9] James Madison, Virginia Constitutional Convention on June 6, 1788
[10] Is. 10:5-6
[11] Gen. 6:13
[12] Is. 59:7
[13] 1 Thess. 5:3
[14] Madame Publius, The Chinese Invasion Has Begun, January 27, 2024.;